Without exception the novels are non-canon. In 1996, Pocket Books - who had long published a popular range of Star Trek novels - approach Star Trek: Voyager co-creator Jeri Taylor with an offer she couldn't refuse. accustomed to making statements about canon, but even he was known to Why do the mountain people make roughly spherical houses? Taylor had found herself simply adoring the character of Kathryn Janeway, to such an extent that she joked she sometimes resented that Kate Mulgrew got to define her on the small screen, and Pocket Books suggested she should pen Janeway's definitive backstory. Does paying down debt in an S Corp decrease profitability? movies have been called into question as to whether they should be I just started reading the Star Trek books and would like to know what is the best order for reading so that I can progress chronologically. Star Trek has always had a loose relationship with the idea of canonicity, with Gene Roddenberry not particularly concerned about whether or not episodes contradicted one another. Stack Exchange network consists of 176 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. As the number of Star Trek series increased, and novels for each series slotted into the publishing schedule, Pocket reached a peak of publishing two mass-market paperbacks a month, a pattern which continued for ten years until 2005, when it was reduced to one per month. To this end, Pocket Books was formed. On 29 March 2016, it was announced that Pocket Books, in conjunction with CBS Consumer Products, would be offering over 700 Star Trek titles as DRM-free eBooks. Take your favorite fandoms with you and never miss a beat. Is there a way to find JPEG files that are not images? Can the President of the United States pardon proactively? Is Section 31 unofficially sanctioned to any extent? It's worth noting, however, that both Star Trek: Picard and recent tie-ins have matched up with this perfectly. Star Trek has always had a loose relationship with the idea of canonicity, with Gene Roddenberry not particularly concerned about whether or not episodes contradicted one another. Ultimately, the fans, the writers and the producers A total of sixteen titles, both novels and reference books, were intended to coincide with the premiere of the film, including one flippantly titled U.S.S. That is around 40% of all Star Trek fiction ever published. Even this wasn't a hard-and-fast rule, with two tie-in novels written by Jeri Taylor - the co-creator of Star Trek: Voyager - used by the show's writers when scripting episodes of the series. The series has contained oblique references to the books, including Tilly's mentioning being a runaway, or Burnham referring to a brief moment of peace reached between herself and Spock some time ago. A frequently-used concept in the Pocket Books novels of the 1980s was the existence of a second five-year voyage of the USS Enterprise under Captain Kirk (taking place either before or after The Motion Picture), something which was not stated in canon, but did not contradict the chronology known at the time. Why did they let Mudd go with so much secret information? In Star Trek, prior to Discovery, has a ship been shown dropping out of warp from the outside? [1]. As such, Star Trek has traditionally considered all the comics and novels to be non-canon, however good they may be. Determining CRS from given point coordinate set. Here's your guide to all the Star Trek tie-ins that should really be considered canon. But canon is not something set in stone; even events in some of the Section 31 was also mentioned in Star Trek Into Darkness movie. Particularly with regard to The Original Series, it is generally accepted that the number of novels published means that the characters would not have had enough time to participate in all of the depicted adventures. Abrams Books and 47North have since also been contracted to release licensed Star Trek reference books. Generally speaking none of the Star Trek books are considered to officially be canon. Here's your guide to all the Star Trek tie-ins that should really be considered canon. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. The books are generally really good though (especially Destiny and Cold Equations trilogies), so I personally integrate them into head canon. Chronology and continuity in the Pocket novels. Not just 'generally speaking'. A further tie-in novel, Una McCormack's The Last Best Hope, will be published in 2020. That being said, the licensed factbooks (especially the Star Trek Encyclopedia and TNG Technical Manual) are explicitly stated to be at the same canon level as the shows. However, due to the film's mixed reception, only about half of these were ultimately released. Black and white races are equal - in the New Testament? Using water as a high density storable hydro-lox propellant. The first - Star Trek: Picard Countdown - is essential backstory to the TV series, revealing why Jean-Luc Picard lost faith in the Federation and presumably resigned. Some Star Trek TV series like Star Trek: Deep Space Nine have also mentioned/ shown it. Before I read it, I want to know whether it is canon. Enterprise Officer's Date Book (Playboy magazine, January 1980, p. 310). He was even quite dismissive of the movies, preferring the TV shows, and he famously had no interest in tie-in media that … Their first title was the 1979 Star Trek Speaks, published under the imprint "Wallaby Books" in reference to the publisher's logo – as a wallaby is a smaller species of kangaroo – , and a brand which, like the "Wanderer Books" imprint for juvenile readers, was used for Star Trek titles on occasion in that period. This included the (temporary, was later reversed) death of Kathryn Janeway in the novel Before Dishonor, and the Enterprise novels retconning Trip Tucker's death. is canon has become more fluid, especially as there isn't a single This led to two novels, Mosaic and Pathways, the only books published in the '90s that have a claim to canon. It also released hardcover and trade paperback novels and reference works until an editorial reorganization at Simon & Schuster in 2009, when those formats were incorporated into a new imprint, Gallery Books. The origins of the company date back to 1939, with the publication of the first paperback books in the US by Robert Fair de Graff. In the wake of that publication, here are all the tie-ins that seem to be part of the Star Trek canon. that take place within the By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Service. David G. Hartwell was instrumental in getting the initial Star Trek license and authors for the series, and was the first editor of the line. He was even quite dismissive of the movies, preferring the TV shows, and he famously had no interest in tie-in media that had been arranged by licensing departments. Here are all the published and upcoming books to date: To date, two official tie-ins have been confirmed for the Star Trek: Picard series. To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Some strange moves in Polgar vs Najer (2009), What's is the purpose of a trailing '-' in a Kubernetes apply -f -. The filmmakers were closely involved with the production of the comic, and as a result it's generally been considered to be canon - unless or until it's contradicted somehow. Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry was As such, a number of the Star Trek novels are released under the Pocket Star Books imprint when released in ebook format. Stack Exchange Network Stack Exchange network consists of 176 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. The Star Trek: Picard Countdown miniseries marks a milestone in the franchise's history; this tie-in comic reveals important backstory for the TV series, and even retrospectively confirms that some of the 2009 comics are considered canon as well. (How) should we mark the 10th anniversary of SFF.SE? The only material considered 100% canon to Star Trek are the television series (except the Animated Series) and the feature films, though there have been many statements acknowledging that it is fluid and no one has a definitive answer to what is truly Star Trek. Publication outside the US was sub-licensed to (amongst others) Titan Books for the UK market, Heyne Verlag, VGS Verlag and Heel Verlag for the German market, Fanucci Editore for the Italian market, and Dai-X and Bunkasha for Japan, in translation where applicable. How many witnesses saw the Discovery go into the wormhole? Licenses to publish reference books were eventually extended to other publishers, starting in 2009 when Titan Books published Star Trek - The Art of the Film. The Pocket Books logo is a kangaroo named "Gertrude". https://www.ign.com/.../whats-canon-and-whats-not-in-star-trek-discovery site design / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. What is the release date order for all of Star Trek? voice or arbiter to decide. Its just as much canon as the George Lucas Star Wars movie novel.The reason why Treks canon is a mess is because there have been different people in charge,GR,Harve Bennet,Berman.If only GR had brought the rights to Star Trek,in the early 70s,the excellent background work wrote into TMP novel eg new Klingon cruisers,new humans,Star FLeet comand policy could have been expanded in the …